If we had a gathering of all the makers of crap films, and we addressed this gathering of luminaries, and asked that each and every one which had not yet been covered in some way in the BMR to stand, probably one of the more surprising personages rising to their feet would be Herschel Gordon Lewis. Surprising in that, with his partner, producer David Friedman (who was covered somewhat in our review of Love Camp 7), H.G. created the genre of the gore film with this movie. Having turned out a number of "nudie-cuties", humorous little films with preposterous excuses to see naked women, and some nudist colony features, Friedman and Lewis sought the Next Big Thing, as Hollywood was starting to nudge its way into their pulchritudinous territory - and thus was the gore film born, out of economic concerns. And boy, does it show.
I lean toward the coincidence side of the argument. The world can be an unspeakably weird place, but it is rarely weird on such a grand and consistent basis. A shower of frogs here, a deity on a flapjack there.... nothing so grandiose as Satan taking a Jacuzzi in a stretch of sea water for close to a century. Besides, one should never scoff at the power of coincidence. After all, whose life has not been touched by the sardonic hand of coincidence? Who has not gone out to dinner and held forth, loudly and at great length, on the utter assholiness of one's boss, only to find the selfsame boss seated in the next booth? Who hasn't dumped a deadbeat lover, only to have him or her win the Lottery the next week? Who hasn't injected a troublesome patient with what he thought was distilled water, but was actually hyper-adrenalin? Wait - that was a bad example. Coincidence is a powerful force in film, too: note how often coincidence plays a major part in many scripts.
And one standard that Lewis and Friedman can have
claimed to create if this: if there is a homicidal maniac abroad
murdering and mutilating women, well, then, it must be time for
a shower! Well, no, our producer and director used to make "nudie
cuties", remember? So it is time for a bubble bath.
So Number One settles back in her suds, reading that relaxing tome,
Ancient Weird Religious Rites. Enter our Mad Killer, Fuad
Ramses (Mal Arnold), with a loooong knife. One stab later, Next, his body artfully covering the process, Fuad begins hacking away at the body in the bathtub, finally turning so we can see him grasping a mannequin's leg with some meat stuffed in the end. We are then left with a close up of the stump sticking out of the bathwater, complete with jutting leg bone (damn! That was one sharp knife!) It is hard, after a quarter of a century of Friday the 13ths and zombie pictures, to think that there was a time when this could be shocking on such a primal level. But to a country apparently satisfied with Petticoat Junction and Tammy movies, this must have been like a bolt of lightning straight to the spinal cord. One thing for which coincidence cannot be blamed
is the fact that the Miami Police Department had only two homicide
Oh, wait, no, first we need some exposition. We find our googly-eyed Fuad running a specialty food store. Enter Mrs. Fremont, a society matron who wishes to employ his Exotic Catering Service to provide something special for her daughter's upcoming party. "Have you ever had," Asks Fuad, pausing significantly, "an Egyptian feast (organ sting)?" Fuad also uses his hypnotic eyes on Mrs. Fremont to convince her to book the aforementioned Egyptian feast (organ sting); apparently he uses all the hypnosis he has in stock, because he never uses it again. In the back of his store, Fuad has a department store mannequin which has been spray-painted gold, and which he is worshipping as the Egyptian goddess Ishtar. His various murders and carrying off of body parts is part of the ritual of the Blood Feast of Ishtar. Luckily for him, this catering gig will provide him with the payoff he needs for the Blood Feast... exactly what this payoff is, we will (alas) never know. Hope I haven't ruined the ending for you. Once more, our detectives are presented with a clue: Victim #2 belonged, we are told by her parents, to some sort of book club, much like Victim #1. "Hmmmm... book..... book... that sounds familiar." Naaaaahhh.....
Now, Suzette Fremont (Connie Mason, Playboy's Miss June 1963) is the daughter for whom Mrs. Fremont was contracting the Egyptian feast (organ sting!), so we are forced to have a scene that we may get to know her. Suzette talks with her mother about the upcoming party and the murders; this scene is a Battle of the Bad Actresses almost epic in its scope. As an actress, Mason is..... enthusiastic, shall we say. Bolton is unrelentingly perky, like Mrs. Howell on speed. The combination makes you earnestly hope for another murder. In that room. Right now. Okay, so Suzette is dating Pete (William Kerwin),
one of the idiots investigating the murders. He and Suzette are
also attending the Suzette and Pete go out necking after the lecture, but they are safe, because their names appear on the movie poster (not that this helped Janet Leigh or anything). It is also broad daylight. No, wait, it's night. No, it's daytime. No, it's.... sigh. Is Ed Wood running the camera? Doesn't matter anyway, as the Plot Point Specific Radio® ("PPSR! Playing you all the bits that advance the plot, twenty-four hours a day! News you can use!") informs them that another victim of the killer has been found, this time still alive. After dropping Suzette off, Pete meets the Idiot In Charge (Scott H. Hall) at the hospital, where the victim lies with her head bound in bandages. We are told that this is because "her face was hacked off, and both eyes gouged out!" More likely it is so Lewis and Friedman did not have to pay another actor, and recycled one of the earlier victims. In any case, this anonymous woman dies after telling IIC that her killer kept saying the name "Eetar! Eeetar!" Hm. Ishtar... Eeetar. Ishtar.... Eeetar. Nope. Doesn't ring a bell. Idiots. Fuad, meantime, gets yet another order for his book, Ancient Weird Religious Rites, which must be some kind of bestseller among young maidens, as it's how he's been targeting his victims - the "book club" the cops kept ignoring. As luck - and our old pal, Mr. Coincidence would have it - this new order is from Trudy (Toni Calvert) a friend of Suzette's, and at this very moment, she is frolicking in Suzette's pool. Yes, this is just an excuse to show Connie Mason in a bikini. Not that I'm complaining, mind you now. And Fuad, realizing that the cops can't catch him unless Shaggy and Scooby pitch in and help, knocks out Trudy and carries her away. In broad daylight. In Suzette's front yard.
Meanwhile, back at Idiot Headquarters, Pete and the IIC bemoan their lack of progress and generally suck all the oxygen out of the room. Pete calls Suzette with the bad news (hardly unexpected) that they have no idea where Trudy is; Suzette, however, has her mother's perky genes and cannot dwell on the fact that her friend is in the clutches of a homicidal maniac, oh no, she has to talk about the dinner party that evening. After all, she informs Pete, her mother has arranged for something called the Feast of Ishtar. Pete finally listens to what the audience has been shouting for the past half hour and makes some phone calls. Most films of the tracking-the-killer sort have a scene of this type, where the hero finally puts all the information together in a dramatic fashion. This, however, is Blood Feast, so what we have is a scene of Pete endlessly dialing the phone and talking to people (and we never hear the person on the other end of the line - that might have cost money). He dials up Professor Boring of Synchronicity University, asks him a few questions about the Feast of Ishtar, and finds out that Fuad Ramses wrote Ancient Weird Religious Rites. Hey, isn't that the book they found at the leg murder? Yes, you idiot, yes!!!!
The police arrive and Pete sends two uniforms chasing after Fuad, who is trying to be nondescript by running down the street with a machete in his hand (what? he didn't drive there?). Pete then wastes several minutes telling the distraught Suzette about the horror show back at Fuad's, until the IIC reminds him that they really should try to catch the murderer. You know, being cops and all. And it's a good thing that Pete and the IIC join in, because although Fuad is an old man with a gimp leg, he is still perfectly capable of outrunning two young and fit-looking uniformed officers. Yes, Fuad is an early practitioner of Off Camera Teleportation®, where every time the camera cuts back to the pursuing policemen, the villain manages to add another hundred feet to the gap between them. Well, to be fair, at one point, Fuad throws the machete at them, and I imagine all four of the cops fell back about fifty feet. You know, just to be safe.
Pete recounts his line of deduction that lead him to his culprit; nothing we hadn't sussed inside of twenty minutes into the flick, but the filmmakers are trying desperately to pad the picture out to the magical feature-length of 70 minutes (they failed; it's still only 67 minutes long). With everything finally said, everybody lights up and goes home (that's why Fuad could outrun them! He was a non-smoker!) The end. I know I've slammed the actors rather mercilessly
this time out; fairness demands that I mention that Scott H. Hall,
whom I have picked for the sterling distinction of Worst Actor,
has a good excuse: he is, literally, not an actor. He was a grip.
The actor cast in the role of Idiot In Charge did not show up, and
he stepped into the part. And in even more fairness, I should mention
that William Kerwin - here still using his stage name of Thomas
Wood - is actually a good actor, and it's not just the rest
of the cast The other thing holding Blood Feast back is the economic necessity of Lewis being his own camera operator, and either he's not very good (sorry, guy) or the camera head on the tripod needed oiling severely. There are any number of tortured pans composed of many starts and stops, and actors leaning out of frame with the camera madly adjusting a couple of inches to get them back in the picture. Lewis claims he never made more than three takes of any scene. I believe him. The acting in Blood Feast is what makes the goings-on laughable and somewhat tolerable, but there is no denying that even today, the gore has a certain impact; there is a raw, primitive quality to the makeup that is affecting in a way that the super-slick gore effects of today are not. It is interesting to think what it must have been like in that first drive-in in Peoria, opening night - expecting, perhaps, another rubber monster or Psycho rip-off, and instead getting raw meat waved in your face - and in color!
But Lewis himself has been frequently quoted as saying that Blood Feast was "...like Walt Whitman poetry - no damn good, but it was the first of its kind." Too true - it should be watched for its historical value, but be sure to warm up your hooting and jeering equipment beforehand - you will need it.
RATING:
No damn good, but the first of its kind. - May 21, 2000 |
||
![]() |